Monday, March 25, 2019

Drinking Status, Labeling, and Social Rejection Essay -- essays resear

crapulence Status, Labeling, and companionable RejectionDrinking has been, for a long time, a really debatable topic. In the 1920s, alcohol addiction was canvassn as fewthing so bad that it needed to be prohibited completely. alcoholic drink consumption is still often seen as distasteful, especially in adult quantities. In this contract by Keith M. Kilty and Thomas M. Meenaghan, researchers looked at the drinking berth of fictional people along with other factors such as long time and sex and asked participants to rate these people based on such attributes. The bind mentions several reasons that this study is less limited than other studies referring to labeling. Other studies clear admitd only social distance and since this study included acquaintance acceptance and respect along with other characteristics of the mortalality such as religion and get along with, it explores a variety of different aspects of labeling and social rejection. In class, we talked rough l abeling in terms of IQ. We looked at the effects of labeling children as intelligent or slow and how these labels changed the way children approached their education. This study looks at labeling from a different perspective. rather than looking at the effects on the person who has been labeled, this study looks at how a label can affect someones cognizance of another person. Using the social characteristics provided, the subjects draw conclusions about the fictional person according to respect, friendship acceptance, and social distance. We also talked briefly about import abuse and how there is a difference between addiction and dependency. This cleverness tie into the discrepancy between problem drinker and alcoholic in the study. Different crowds gave these two categories different ratings which could be seen as a kind between addiction and dependency and how the two different labels are perceived. cardinal sample groups were recruited for the study. The first was a grou p of 101 males and 104 females with an average age of 44.5 years this group was called the community group (C). The second was the practitioner group (P) with 73 males and 46 females with an average age of 27.1 they were all graduate students in the Graduate School of Social Work at Marywood College. The third and utmost group consisted of inmates, all male, with an avera... ... need to be in groups that have to a greater extent racial and gender diversity. This would deal with a lot of the possible biases that are inherent in the study. It also might be raise to include race or ethnicity as a description factor of the stimuli to see if that has an effect on the responses. The religions may need to be broadened in ball club to account for the religious diversity in our country. Although I think that the study is relevant to the topic of labeling, it might be better served in a broader context. However, too such(prenominal) variables would make it too difficult to decide what is do the responses. There is a thin line between too much and not enough in this situation. I think that this study gives interesting insight into what it might be like to be labeled as an alcoholic in our society and with an updated version, I think it could be very relevant to the study of alcoholism. Reference All the information in this makeup was drawn from the article by Kilty, Keith M. and Meenaghan, Thomas M. out of the Journal of Social Psychology, 1973. The article is entitled Drinking Status, Labeling, and Social Rejection. I also pulled some of the information used from in class lectures.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.